JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 25, 2004

T-503 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant David Name Teran Vs. Tribunal Superior De Barranquilla

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso. Declaratoria De Nulidad. Proceso De Separacion De Bienes Liquidacion De Sociedad Conyugal Y Cesacion De Efectos Civiles De Matrimonio Catolico. Mecanismo Procesal Equivocado Por Apoderado. Cosa Juzgada Como Excepcion Previa O De
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada
  • Liquidación de la sociedad conyugal
  • Apoderado del demandado planteó una declaratoria de nulidad en lugar de una excepción
  • Apoderado del demandado podía plantearla como excepción previa o de fondo
  • Apoderado del demandado solicitó nulidad del auto admisorio de la demanda
Debido Proceso
  • Tribunal no incurrió en vía de hecho por revocar la declaratoria de nulidad
2 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la Sentencia proferida el 11 de noviembre de 2003 por la Sala Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, que negó la tutela del derecho fundamental al debido proceso invocada por David Name Terán.
  2. Segundo. DÉSE cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.