JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 20, 2004

T-495 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Luis Enrique Betancur Arenas Y Otro Vs. Tribunal Superior De Medellin

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos Al Debido Proceso Igualdad Y Acceso A La Administracion De Justicia De Empleados De Carrera Aforados. Via De Hecho. Solicitud Reintegro. Carga De La Prueba. Deber Del Juez. Proceso De Reestructuracion. Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales. Nega
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales
  • No procede para enjuiciar valoración probatoria hecha por el juez en una controversia
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR los fallos de tutela proferidos por la Sala Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, en primera instancia, y por la Sala Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, en segunda instancia, dentro de la acción de tutela promovida por Luis Enrique Betancur Arenas y Omar Guillermo Olaya Cardona contra la Sala Décima de Decisión Laboral del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Medellín.
  2. SEGUNDO. DESE cumplimiento a lo previsto por el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.