JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 24, 1996

T-471 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Luis Rodriguez Acevedo

✓
Topic · hard data
Improcedencia De La Tutela Para Exigir El Pago De Obligaciones Pecuniarias De Una Entidad Adtiva. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Pago suma debida por municipio
Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia pago de dineros por entidad estatal
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. R E S U E L V E
  2. PRIMERO. REVOCAR el fallo proferido por la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Riohacha, el dia 25 de abril de 1996, objeto de esta revision, con excepcion del numeral 2deg de dicha providencia, el cual confirma.
  3. SEGUNDO. DENEGAR la tutela solicitada por el senor Luis Rodriguez Acevedo.
  4. TERCERO. LIBRESE por Secretaria las comunicaciones a que se refiere el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.