JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 20, 1996

T-461 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Luis Fernando Penna Valencia

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Educacion. Der. Al Trabajo. Permiso De Estudio Posteriormente Revocado. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Educación
  • Revocación permiso para especialización
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR las sentencias proferidas dentro del expediente T-99.181, por el Juzgado Promiscuo del Circuito de Pácora y la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Manizales, y en su lugar CONCEDER la acción de tutela del derecho a la educación y al trabajo del señor Luis Fernando Penna Valencia, ordenando al Alcalde de Pácora, que mantenga el permiso de estudio inicialmente concedido por el tiempo necesario, para que el actor culmine su año lectivo, una vez transcurrido el curso, podrá disponer lo siguiente, de acuerdo con las necesidades del servicio.
  2. Segundo. COMUNICAR a través de la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional, el contenido de la sentencia al Juzgado Promiscuo del Circuito de Pácora y, al Alcalde demandado.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.