JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 18, 1997

T-449 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Jorge Hernando Niño Aponte

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Particulares. Responsabilidad Civil. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Transportes Omega Ltda. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Transitoria Para Reconocimiento De Sustitucion Pensional
  • Inexistencia de inminente riesgo por retardo en práctica de cirugía estética
Indefension
  • Del usuario frente a la empresa transportadora
Accion De Tutela Contra Particulares
  • Procedencia contra empresa transportadora
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Responsabilidad civil de empresa transportadora por accidente de ocupante
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. CONFIRMAR por las razones expuestas, el fallo proferido por el Juzgado Veinticuatro Penal del Circuito de Bogotá el 8 de abril de 1997 en relación con la acción de tutela formulada por Jorge Hernando Niño Aponte contra la Cooperativa de Transportes Omega Ltda.
  4. Segundo. LÍBRENSE por Secretaría las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.