JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 6, 2004

T-418 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Jose Euclides Sanchez Vs. Secretaria De Transito Y Transporte De Bogota

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Trabajo De Conductor De Buseta Del Servicio Publico. Retencion Licencia De Conduccion. Mora En Pago De Infraccciones Multas O Comparendos. Inexequibilidad De Fundamento Legal. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Licencia De Conduccion
  • Retención
  • No existe disposición legal que permita retención
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Revocar la sentencia de fecha 9 de septiembre de 2003, proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Bogotá, en la acción de tutela presentada por José Euclides Sánchez contra la Secretaría de Tránsito y Transporte de Bogotá, al haber sido declarada inexequible la disposición del Código Nacional de Tránsito que así lo permitía.
  3. En consecuencia, si aún no lo hubiere hecho, dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación de esta tutela, la Secretaría de Tránsito y Transporte de Bogotá debe devolverle la licencia de conducción al actor.
  4. Por Secretaría General líbrense las comunicaciones previstas en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.