JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 25, 1993

T-343 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Manuel Martinez

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Victima De Atentado Al Das. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (9 points)
  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. REVOCAR LA SENTENCIA relacionada con la acción de la referencia, proferida por el Tribunal Superior de Santafé de Bogotá, Sala de Decisión Civil , el 18 de marzo de 1993.
  4. Segundo. CONFIRMAR LA SENTENCIA, proferida por el Juzgado Veintidós Civil del Cicuito el 24 de febrero de 1993, por la cual se deniega la solicitud de tutela presentada por Manuel Ignacio Martínez Pineda.
  5. En consecuencia, pueden revocarse las órdenes dadas en desarrollo y acatamiento del numeral
  6. tercero. de la mencionada providencia del Tribunal Superior de Santafé de Bogotá.
  7. Tercero. Comunicar la presente decisión al Fondo de Solidaridad y Emergencia de la Presidencia de la República.
  8. Cuarto. Comunicar la presente decisión Juzgado Veintidós Civil del Circuito de Santafé Bogotá para los efectos de la notificación a las partes, de conformidad con lo establecido en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  9. Notifíquese, cópiese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.