JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 29, 1994

T-296 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Amadeo Mora Ortiz

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Particulares. Sometimiento De Los Jueces Al Imperio De La Ley. Omision De Las Funciones Por Las Autoridades. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Alcalde
  • Facultades
Juez De Tutela
  • Competencia frente a demandas de autoridades administrativas
Juez
  • Sometimiento al imperio de la ley
Accion De Cumplimiento
  • Falta de desarrollo legal
9 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. PRIMERO. Confirmar la sentencia del Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Penal del Circuito de Fundacion, Magdalena, fechada el 4 de febrero de 1994, pero, por las razones expuestas en la presente providencia.
  3. SEGUNDO. Remitir copia de esta providencia a la Procuraduria General de la Nacion para lo de su competencia, en relacion con la actuacion administrativa del senor Alcalde encargado y el senor Asesor Juridico, ambos del municipio de El Pinon, Magdalena, en la administracion del conflicto que origino la presente accion de tutela.
  4. TERCERO. Comunicar esta providencia al Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de El Pinon, Magdalena, para lo previsto en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  5. Comuniquese, notifiquese, cumplase e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.