JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 29, 1994

T-295 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Kassab Y Saporitti S. En C.

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Der. De Postulacion. Temeridad. Juez Natural. Tenencia De Inmueble. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

7 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. Confirmar la sentencia adoptada por el Honorable Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafé de Bogotá, Sala Penal, el dos (2) de febrero de mil novecientos noventa y cuatro (1994).
  2. SEGUNDO. Condenar al pago de las costas del presente proceso a la firma demandante, Kasab y Saporitti S. en C., por haber incurrido en temeridad. El Juzgado Cuarenta y Dos Penal del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá D. C., que actuó como juzgado de primera instancia, procederá con la liquidación de tales costas y con lo que se requiera para dar cabal cumplimiento al artículo 25 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. TERCERO. Comunicar la presente providencia al Juzgado Cuarenta y Dos Penal del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá D.C., para los efectos del artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. Comuníquese, notifíquese, cúmplase e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.