JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 31, 2005

T-293 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Juan Carlos Pinzon Espinosa Vs. Municipio De Floridablanca Y Otro

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud Del Menor
  • Hecho superado por entrega de carnet de afiliación a ARS
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la vida la salud y la seguridad social de menor beneficiario del sisben que sufre leucemia promiolecida aguda y a quien la alcaldía se ha abstenido de entregarle el carnet correspondiente para ser atendido.

Solicita se ordene a la alcaldía la expedicion y entrega del carnet de la ars para recibir la atención medica requerida.

Sustracción de materia y carencia de objeto por la entrega del carnet por parte del municipio de floriblanca.

Carencia de objeto

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia del Juzgado
  2. Primero. de Familia de Bucaramanga que se revisa, en cuanto denegó la acción de tutela de la referencia.
  3. SEGUNDO. Declarar la carencia actual de objeto.
  4. TERCERO. Por Secretaria General, líbrense las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.