JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 24, 1996

T-278 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Gustavo Jurado Henao

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Salud. Der. De Peticion. Der. A La Educacion. Expedicion De Libreta Militar. Concedida Parcialmente.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Servicio Militar
  • Exención por inhabilidad física
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. Confirmar parcialmente la sentencia del Juzgado
  2. Décimo. Civil del Circuito de Barranquilla, de fecha 27 de noviembre de 1995, por las razones expuestas en la presente providencia. En consecuencia, se tutelan el derecho a la salud del joven Pedro Pablo Jurado Durán y el de petición del abogado Roberto Orozco Caballero. No se tutelan los derechos a la educación ni la debido proceso.
  3. Segundo. Por encontrarse superada la situación que dio lugar a esta sentencia, sólo se prevendrá al Distrito Militar Nro. 10, en los términos del artículo 24 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. Tercero. Comuníquese esta decisión al Juzgado Diez y ocho Civil Municipal de Barranquilla, para que sean notificadas las partes, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.