JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 9, 2000

T-275 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Luis Humberto Rodriguez Corrales

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Colsubsidio Por Subsidio De Vivienda. Adquisicion De Vivienda Nueva O Usada. No Fue Posible Notificar Al Demandante Para Que Explicara Sus Razones. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Subsidio De Vivienda
  • Solicitud y aprobación con anterioridad al nuevo régimen
Acción De Tutela
  • Acreditación suficiente de afectación de interés jurídico
Demanda De Tutela
  • Mínimo de diligencia procesal del accionante
Informes En Revision De Tutela
  • No suministro por el accionante pese a utilización de poderes oficiosos
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Controversia relacionadas con la aplicación de normas legales
5 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las razones expuestas, el fallo proferido por Juez Veinte Civil del Circuito de Bogota.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.