JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 1, 1994

T-257 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Maria Ines Guasca

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Ascenso De Docente En Escalafon. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR el fallo del juzgado
  2. sexto. laboral del circuito de Santafé de Bogotá D.C.
  3. SEGUNDO. Conceder la acción de tutela de MARIA INES GUASCA CAMARGO contra la Junta Seccional de Escalafón Docente de Santafé de Bogotá D.C. y en consecuencia, ordenar a la entidad resolver la petición presentada por la accionante en un término máximo de 48 horas contados a partir de la notificación del fallo, a menos que la entidad se hubiese pronunciado con respecto a la petición formulada.
  4. TERCERO. Remitir copia de esta providencia a la Procuraduría General del la Nación, para que proceda con lo de su competencia, en razón de las omisiones en que e incurrió la Junta Seccional de Escalafón Docente durante el trámite de este proceso.
  5. CUARTO. Advertir a la entidad accionada que el desacato de la presente decisión judicial será sancionado conforme al artículo 52 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.