JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 31, 1995

T-239 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Rocey Herminia Gil Palacios Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Igualdad. Discriminacion De Docentes Por No Ser Oriundos Del Mismo Dpto Donde Se Van A Nombrar. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Personal Docente
  • Convocatoria por grados
  • Discriminación por origen
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. R E S U E L V E :
  2. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido por la Sección Segunda del Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo del Valle del Cauca, el 16 de marzo de 1995, dentro del proceso de tutela instaurado por ROCEY HERMINIA GIL PALACIOS.
  3. SEGUNDO. CONFIRMAR parcialmente la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  4. Quinto. Laboral del Circuito de Cartagena el 22 de marzo de 1995, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia, en relación con la solicitud de tutela formulada por el señor TIBERIO ALFONSO LARA ORTIZ.
  5. TERCERO. LIBRENSE por la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.