JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 20, 2002

T-213 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Leonila Mejia Palacio Vs. Teresa Y Carlota Johnson

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos Al Minimo Vital Dignidad Humana Vida Y Seguridad Social De Persona De La Tercera Edad. Falta De Legitimacion Activa. Agencia Oficiosa. Autonomia Personal. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Autonomia Personal
  • No se puede interponer tutela por otra persona cuando no está de acuerdo
Agencia Oficiosa En Tutela
  • Consentimiento del particular
Falta De Legitimacion Por Activa En Tutela
  • La persona a nombre de quien se interpuso manifestó que no deseaba el amparo
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia del Juzgado
  2. Octavo. Laboral del Circuito de Medellín que decidió no tutelar los derechos constitucionales de la señora María Carlina Pimienta Mejía, y en su lugar rechazar por improcedente la tutela interpuesta por Leonila Mejía Palacio, por falta de legitimación activa.
  3. Segundo. LÍBRESE por Secretaría la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.