JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 12, 1993

T-191 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Manuel Dante

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Prevalencia Del Derecho Sustancial. Reconocimiento De Pension. Nulidad
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. DECLARAR la nulidad, de todo lo actuado, a partir de la providencia del dieciseis (16) de diciembre de mil novecinetos noventa y dos (1992), inclusive, proferida por el Juzgado 1o. Laboral del Circuito de Santafe de Bogota, por la cual se rechazo la solicitud de accion de tutela formulada a traves de apoderado judicial por el senor MANUEL DANTE PAIS GARCIA.
  2. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR al Juzgado 1o. Laboral del Circuito de Santafe de Bogota, que adelante el proceso, en debida forma, con arreglo a las disposiciones de los decretos 2591 de 1991 y 306 de 1992.
  3. TERCERO. DEVOLVER el expediente al Juzgado 1o. Laboral del Circuito de Santafe de Bogota, para efectos de notificar el presente fallo al accionante y dar cumplimiento a lo resuelto.
  4. Copiese.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.