JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 16, 2001

T-187 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Paulina Caceres Herrera Y Otros Vs. Distrito De Santa Marta

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Igualdad Seguridad Social Vida Y Minimo Vital. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Salarios. Pago Aportes A Salud Por Empleador. Hecho Superado. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Hecho superado por pago de acreencias laborales
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR los fallos proferidos el 10, 11, y 17 de febrero de 2000 por el Consejo de Estado en los procesos de la referencia, y en su lugar declarar improcedentes las acciones de tutela, en virtud de haberse superado los hechos que las motivaron.
  2. Segundo. LÍBRENSE por Secretaría las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí previstos.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.