JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 15, 2001

T-186 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Martha Lucia Hincapie Romero Vs. Iss Valle Del Cauca

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida Y Salud. Practica Examenes De Protocolo Para Transplante Renal De Cadaver O Intrafamiliar. Prestacion Atencion Medica Requerida. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Fundamental por conexidad con la vida
Derecho A La Vida Digna
  • Atención médica por EPS
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Noveno. Civil del Circuito de Cali, el 10 de noviembre de 2000 y, en consecuencia, ORDENAR a la E.P.S. Instituto de Seguros Sociales, Seccional Valle del Cauca, que dentro de los cinco (5) días siguientes a la notificación de la presente providencia, inicie la prestación de toda la atención médica que requiere la accionante Martha Lucía Hincapié Romero, atendiendo lo que para el efecto diagnostiquen los especialistas en la materia.
  3. Líbrense por Secretaría, las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.