JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 2, 1997

T-168 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Nelson Constantino Viscay Quintero

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Solicitud De Reliquidacion De Pension. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Pronta resolución
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia de fecha veintitrés (23) de octubre de mil novecientos noventa y seis (1996), proferida por la Corte Suprema de Justicia. En consecuencia, se concede la tutela solicitada por el señor Nelson Constantino Viscay Quintero contra la Caja Nacional de Previsión.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Caja Nacional de Previsión resolver la solicitud de reliquidación de la pensión del demandante en un plazo de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contado a partir de la notificación de esta sentencia.
  3. Tercero. LÍBRENSE, por al Secretaría General de la Corte, las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, en la forma y para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.