JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 29, 1996

T-168 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Pedro Nel Lara Ahumada

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Solicitud De Reconocimiento De Pension De Invalidez. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Pronta resolución
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo de fecha veintiuno (21) de noviembre de 1995, proferido por la Sala Plena Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, y en consecuencia CONFIRMAR el fallo de fecha veinte (20) de octubre de 1995, proferido por la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santa Marta, mediante el cual se tuteló el derecho de petición del señor Pedro Nel Lara Ahumada y se ordenó al Director General del Instituto de Seguros Sociales que resuelva la petición de pensión de invalidez presentada por el actor, dentro del término de diez días, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de la presente providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.