JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 8, 2002

T-168 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Maria Etelvina Diaz Bernal Vs. Ministerio De Educacion Nacional

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A Ser Informado Educacion Y Debido Proceso De Comunidad Universitaria. Notificacion Apertura Investigacion Administrativa. Deber De Comunicar. Suspension Programas Academicos Por Un Año. Autonomia Universitaria. Universidad Antonio Nariño. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Universidad Antonio Nariño
  • Quienes son partes en el proceso administrativo
  • A quiénes se les notifica la apertura de la investigación administrativa
  • En quiénes recae el deber de comunicar a la comunidad universitaria los asuntos que interesan a la institución
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Confirmar la sentencia de diez y seis (16) de noviembre de dos mil uno (2001), del Consejo de Estado, Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Sección Cuarta, en la acción de tutela pedida por María Etelvina Díaz Bernal contra el Ministerio de Educación Nacional.
  2. Líbrense por Secretaría, las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.