JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 30, 1998

T-163 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Jorge Enrique Dominguez

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Solicitud De Sustitucion Pensional Ante Cajanal. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Investigacion Disciplinaria
  • Procedimiento de respuesta de peticiones
Derecho De Peticion
  • Carácter excepcional de aplazamiento de respuesta
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia de instancia.
  2. Segundo. CONCÉDESE la tutela pedida por JORGE ENRIQUE DOMINGUEZ GUERRERO, cuya petición de sustitución pensional debe ser resuelta de fondo e íntegramente por la Subdirección de Prestaciones Económicas de CAJANAL dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación de este fallo.
  3. Tercero. SE COMPULSAN copias a la Procuraduría General de la Nación para lo de su cargo, en relación con la responsabilidad disciplinaria de los servidores públicos que han ocasionado la mora en la respuesta al peticionario, desfigurando los alcances y el sentido del artículo 6 del Código Contencioso Administrativo.
  4. Cuarto. DESE aplicación al artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.