JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 17, 1995

T-163 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Guillermo Oyola Herazo

✓
Topic · hard data
Uso Indebido De La Accion De Tutela. Pago De Honorarios De Abogado. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR los fallos proferidos por los Juzgados Promiscuo Municipal y Civil del Circuito de Sahagún -Córdoba-, mediante los cuales se resolvió acerca de la acción instaurada por GUILLERMO OYOLA HERAZO.
  2. Segundo. ENVIAR copia de la presente providencia y de sus antecedentes al Consejo Superior de la Judicatura, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria, para los fines propios de su competencia.
  3. Tercero. LIBRESE la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.