JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 22, 2000

T-158 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Rosalba Galvis Gomez

✓
Topic · hard data
Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Hospital Universitario San Jose De Popayan. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
Establecimiento Hospitalario
  • Situación económica o presupuestal no es óbice para desconocer obligaciones laborales
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR, la sentencia proferida por la Sala Civil Laboral del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Popayan.
  2. En su lugar, CONCEDER la tutela impetrada por Rosalba Galvis Gomez, en cuanto se evidencia la violacion de sus derechos al minimo vital, al trabajo y a la dignidad y justicia que deben caracterizar la relacion laboral.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR a las directivas del Hospital Universitario "San Jose" de Popayan, que cancelen, en cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contadas a partir de la notificacion del presente fallo, los sueldos adeudados a Rosalba Galvis Gomez.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaria, LIBRESE la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.