Tutela ruling (T)March 9, 1999

T-145 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Hugo Tadeo Peroza Garrido

✓

Topic · hard data

Sin Información

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Medio De Defensa Judicial

Incremento salarial

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Der.

De peticion.

Solicitud de aumento de salario en un 15%.

Improcedencia de la tutela para pago de acreencias laborales.

Negada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo del juzgado laboral del Circuito de Arauca, en tanto negó la tutela interpuesta por Hugo Tadeo Pedroza contra la División Administrativa y Financiera de la Secretaría de Educación Departamental de Arauca.
Segundo. DÉSE cumplimiento a lo previsto por el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.

Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data

José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

Magistrado

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it

constitutional review unification tutela

Cites1

T-047/98Revocatoria De Acto Adtivo. Favorabilidad En Materia Laboral. Empleada De La Rama Solicita Se Le Pague Mas Del 75% Del Sueldo. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.

Cited by2

T-544/13Tutela of 2013 T-655/00Improcedencia De La Tutela Para El Pago De Acreencias Laborales O Reajustes Salariales. Docente Que Solicita Aumento Salarial Por Ascenso En El Escalafon. Negada.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.