Tutela ruling (T)September 25, 2000

T-1311 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

✓Claimant Pedro Juan Gomez Salazar Y Otros Vs. Gobernacion De Antioquia.

✓

Topic · hard data

Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Factores No Salariales A Algunos Educadores De Antioquia. Negada.

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho Al Minimo Vital Del Trabajador

No afectación por no pago de primas complementarias de salario a educadores

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)

Primero. REVOCAR los fallos que concedieron la tutela en las siguientes providencias: Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Granada -Antioquia, peticionarios Jorge Enrique Quintero Tamayo y Otro (Expediente T-338026); Juzgado Promiscuo del Circuito de El Bagre, Antioquia, actor Pedro Juan Gómez Salazar y Otros (Expediente T-337867); Tribunal Superior de Medellín, Sala Civil, demandante Gloria Estella Cañaveral (Expediente T-339517); Juzgado
Primero. Civil del Circuito de Medellín, libelista Gloria Amparo Hernández Gómez (Expediente T-340792); Juzgado Veintitrés Civil Municipal de Medellín, peticionaria Ana Cecilia Dávila Giraldo (Expediente T-341900); Juzgado Civil del Circuito de El Santuario, Antioquia, peticionarios Tiberio Alonso Tamayo Giraldo y Otros (Expediente T-343276) y Juzgado
Octavo. Civil del Circuito de Medellín, peticionaria Orfa Montoya (Expediente T-344443).
Segundo. Por Secretaría General, líbrense las comunicaciones previstas en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.

Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data

Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

Magistrado

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it

constitutional review unification tutela

Cites2

T-851/00Improcedencia De La Tutela Para El Pago De Acreencias Laborales De Docentes. Primas. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.T-376/00Improcedencia De La Tutela Para El Pago De Acreencias Laborales De Docentes. Pago De Primas. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.

Cited by0

No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.