JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 21, 2000

T-1276 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Bertha Muñoz De Betancourt Y Otros Vs. Instituto De Seguros Sociales.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida A No Ser Sometido A Tratos Crueles Inhumanos Y Degradantes Y A La Igualdad. Carencia Actual De Objeto. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Carencia actual de objeto por fallecimiento del enfermo
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. Confirmar, por la razón expuesta en la parte motiva, el fallo proferido por la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Bogotá el 24 de mayo de 2000, por medio de la cual se negó la tutela impetrada por los agentes oficiosos del señor Carlos Guillermo Betancourt Montengro.
  2. Segundo. Remitir copia de esta providencia a la Fiscalía General de la Nación, a fin de que esa entidad investigue si, como afirman los actores, la causa médica de la muerte de Carlos Guillermo Betancourt Montenegro fue desatada por el traslado de dicho paciente de la sección de cuidados intensivos a las salas de recuperación.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. Comuníquese, notifíquese, cúmplase e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.