JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 18, 2008

T-1268 de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Jorge Enrique Gomez Montealegre·Respondent Mesa Directiva Del Senado De La Republica Y Presidenta Del Senado De La Republica

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derechos a participar en la conformacion, ejercicio y control del poder politico; A tener iniciativa en la corporacion publica del senado; Al reconocimiento de la personalidad juridica de ciudadano a quien, a pesar de la vacancia de un cupo de congresista que le corresponde, no le ha sido efectivo el nombramiento y posesion como tal. <br>al momento de fallar, la sala advirtio la satisfaccion de la pretension del actor, por lo cual se declaro la cesacion de los motivos que originaron la accion de tutela. <br>negada <br> <br>

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. LEVANTAR la suspension de terminos decretada en el proceso de la referencia.
  2. Segundo. CONFIRMAR la sentencia de 27 de marzo de 2008 de la Seccion Cuarta de la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado (segunda instancia) que revoco la sentencia de 28 de noviembre de 2007 del Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca (primera instancia)
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.