JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 1, 2001

T-119 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Orfidia Velasco De Morana Vs. Juzgado 7 Laboral Del Circuito Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Igualdad Y Debido Proceso. Nivelacion Salarial A Profesora De Matematicas. Trato Discriminatorio. Via De Hecho. Tutela Contra Providencias Juduciales. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Debido Proceso
  • Valoración completa del acervo probatorio
Acción De Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales
  • Procedencia excepcional por vía de hecho
Derecho A La Igualdad
  • Diferencia de trato
  • Diferencia salarial entre docentes
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Confirmar la sentencia proferida por la Sala de Casación Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia el 16 de junio de 2001, por medio de la cual se denegó la tutela solicitada por Orfidia Velasco de Morana, pero por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. Comuníquese, notifíquese, cúmplase e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.