JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 28, 2004

T-1060 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Orlando Quiroz Palechor Vs. Inpec Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud De Interno A Quien Se Le Partio El Parcial Dental Del Maxilar Superior Y Acusa Un Problema De Salud Oral Por Cuanto Se Le Dificulta La Mordida Y Masticada. Solicita Se Ordene La Instalación Del Parcial Dental Y El Tratamiento Odontológi
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia por no vulneración derechos fundamentales
Derecho A La Salud
  • No tiene la categoría de fundamental por conexidad en este caso
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR en su integridad el fallo proferido el día 30 de abril de 2004 por el Juzgado
  2. Cuarto. de Familia de Bucaramanga dentro del proceso de tutela de la referencia.
  3. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General, líbrense las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.