JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 14, 2000

T-1057 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Calixto Nicholls Vs Juzgado Civil Del Circuito De Rionegro (Medellin)

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Via De Hecho. Tutela Contra Sentencias Judiciales. Pago Portes De Correo En Proceso Ejecutivo Singular Por Envio De Expediente Para Tramite De Segunda Instancia. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Falta De Legitimacion Por Activa En Tutela
  • Presentación a nombre del cónyuge
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido por la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casacion Penal, el 22 de febrero de 2000, al resolver sobre la accion de tutela incoada por Calixto Nicholls S. contra el Juzgado Civil del Circuito de Rionegro.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria LIBRESE la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.