JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 9, 1994

T-101 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Jairo Ruiz Medina

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Comision De Etica De La Camara De Representantes. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Tribunal del Distrito Judicial de Santafe de Bogota D.C. el veinticuatro (24) de septiembre de mil novecientos noventa y tres (1993)., por la que se declaro improcedente la accion de tutela solicitada por el ciudadano Jairo Ruiz Medina.
  2. Segundo. Comuniquese la presente providencia al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafe de Bogota D.C., para que sea notificada a las partes y se proceda conforme lo dispone el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.