JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 3, 2000

T-098 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Franklin Antonio Gomez Bermudez Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Gobernacion Del Magdalena. Concedida
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR los fallos proferidos por el Juzgado
  2. Segundo.
  3. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Santa Marta, mediante las cuales se negó la protección de los derechos invocados por los accionantes. En consecuencia, se concede la tutela pedida por Franklin Antonio Gómez Bermúdez y Carlos Caballero Zambrano.
  4. Segundo. SE ORDENA al Gobernador del Departamento del Magdalena que, dentro del término máximo de tres (3) meses, contados desde la notificación de la presente providencia, proceda a cancelar a los demandantes la totalidad de las mesadas adeudadas, con cargo al anticipo contemplado en el parágrafo 6 del artículo 2 de la Ley 549 de 1999.
  5. Tercero. Por Secretaría LÍBRESE la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.