JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 22, 1996

T-073A de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Freddy Velilla Ramos Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Intimidad. Secreto Profesional. Reserva De Informacion. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Fuerzas Armadas. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Filtración de información reservada
Secreto Profesional
  • Límite
  • Deber de reserva
  • Divulgación e información
  • Información de estudio psicológico de suboficiales
2 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes la Sentencia de la H. Corte Suprema de Justicia del 21 de septiembre de 1995 en la que se deniega la acción interpuesta por FREDDY VELILLA RAMOS y CESAR TULIO LOZANO SANDOVAL por los motivos expuestos en esta providencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR a los accionados la sicóloga NORA BEATRIZ RAMIREZ y al mayor ALVARO RICO HERNANDEZ abstenerse de divulgar a terceros el contenido de los informes sicológicos practicados a los accionantes FREDDY VELILLA RAMOS y CESAR TULIO LOZANO SANDOVAL, mantenerlos en absoluta reserva y no incluirlos en sus respectivas hojas de vida. En caso de estarlo, se ordena retirarlos de inmediato para preservar el secreto profesional y el derecho a la intimidad.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.