SU- de 2000
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo
✓Claimant Custodio Jacinto Mora Medina Y Otros Vs. Presidente De La Republica Y Otros
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Imposibilidad de modificar presupuesto para incremento salarial de servidores públicos
- Naturaleza
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (3 points)
- Primero. CONFIRMAR los fallos proferidos por el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Cundinamarca -secciones 1a, 2a y 4a-, el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Ibague -Sala Civil-, el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Pereira -Sala de Familia-, el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Armenia -Sala Laboral-, el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bucaramanga -Sala Civil- y el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogota, -Sala Laboral- en las acciones de tutela correspondientes a los expedientes T-306951, T-307842, T-307841, T-307840, T-307839, T-307838, T-307837, T-307836, T-307803, T-307734, T-307733, T-307411, T-307410, T-307409, T-306954, T-306952, T-308827, T-308688, T-308654, T-308653, T-308652, T-308607, T-308413, T-308144, T-308124, T-307843, T-307354, T-306971, T-307346, T-307345, T-307343, T-307333, T-307201, T-307014, T-307000, T-306999.
- Segundo. RECOMENDAR al Gobierno Nacional que, cuando las circunstancias lo permitan, expida los decretos que determinen el aumento salarial a partir del 1deg de enero del ano 2000 para los empleados publicos y oficiales con el proposito de que los salarios de todos los servidores publicos conserven el poder adquisitivo de los mismos.
- Tercero. Por Secretaria, LIBRESE la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.