JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)December 11, 2009Full bench

C-933 de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Jesus Antonio Ochoa Gonzalez·Respondent Ley 1296 De 2009

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio Por Ineptitud De Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Norma De La Ley 1296 De 2009
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda
Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional Por Ineptitud Sustantiva De La Demanda
  • Incumplimiento de los requisitos de certeza, especificidad y pertinencia en los cargos
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 1296 de 2009, artículo 1, la norma demandada regula las inhabilidades de contratación con el Departamento, de los familiares dentro del cuarto grado de consanguinidd, segundo de afinidad, o primero civil, de los gobernadores, diputados, alcaldes y concejales, el actor considera vulnerado el artículo 292 de nuestra Carta Política debido a que, la norma acusada amplía los grados de parentesco para poder contratar en la correspondiente entidad territorial.

La Corte concluye que existe una ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda ya que el cargo carece de certeza, especificidad y suficiencia, por lo tanto se declara inhibida para emitir un pronunciamiento de fondo

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 1148/07. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionLey 1148/07DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 1Ley 1296/09DECLINED TO RULE
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declararse INHIBIDA para emitir un pronunciamiento de fondo por ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda.
  2. Notifiquese, comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.