JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 30, 2004Full bench

C-817 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Domingo Banda Torregroza

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional En Acto Legislativo Para “enfrentar El Terrorismo”
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Acto legislativo para "enfrentar el terrorismo"
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Acto legislativo 2 de 2003.

Se modifican los articulos 15 24 28 y 250 de la constitucion política para enfrentar el terrorismo.

Caducidad de la accion de inconstitucionalidad.

Cosa juzgada constitucional.

Estarse a lo resuelto en c-816/04.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Acto_legislativo 02/03. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 15Acto_legislativo 02/03ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 15Acto_legislativo 02/03ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Estarse a lo resuelto en la Sentencia C-816-04 que declaro inexequible el Acto Legislativo 02 de 2003, "Por medio del cual se modifican los articulos 15, 24, 28 y 250 de la Constitucion Politica de Colombia para enfrentar el terrorismo".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available4
ConcurrenceManuel José Cepeda EspinosaConcurrenceAlvaro Tafur GalvisConcurrenceRodrigo Escobar GilConcurrenceMarco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.