JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 6, 2001Full bench

C-583 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Yecid Celis Melgarejo

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional En Tiempo Para Subsanar Falta De Armonía En Normas Procedimentales Penales
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Cargos de conveniencia
  • Ausencia de cargos
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Tiempo para subsanar falta de armonía en normas procedimentales penales
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 600 de 2000 arts. 23 y 536 (p).

Codigo de procedimiento penal.

Remision.

Vigencia.

Inhibicion en relacion con el art. 23 por ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda.

Cosa juzgada constitucional en relacion con el art. 536.

Inexequible.

Estese c-582/01

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 600/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 23Ley 600/00DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 530Ley 600/00UPHELD
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. Primero. INHIBIRSE para fallar sobre el artículo 23 de la Ley 600 del 2000, por ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda.
  4. Segundo. ESTESE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C- 582 de 2001, que declaró INEXEQUIBLE el inciso
  5. segundo. del artículo 536 de la Ley 600 de 2000.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Alfredo Beltrán Sierra
Presidente
✓
Alvaro Tafur Galvis
Magistrado
✓
Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez
Magistrado
✓
Eduardo Montealegre Lynett
Magistrado
✓
Jaime Araujo Rentería
Magistrado
✓
Jaime Córdoba Triviño
Magistrado
✓
Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Magistrado
✓
Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Magistrado
✓
Rodrigo Escobar Gil
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 3cited by 2 →C-583/01C-131/93 — Dec. 2067/91 Art. 2 Num. 2 3 4 5 Y 23. Cosa Juzgada Constitucional. Cumplimiento De Sentencias. Exequibles Salvo Art. 23 Expresion "obli · cited 325 timesC-131/931993C-013/00 — Fallo Inhibitorio Por Ineptitud De Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Norma De La Ley 100 De 1993 · cited 220 timesC-013/002000C-582/01 — Facultades Extraordinarias Para Codigos. Alcance De La Prohibición · cited 12 timesC-582/012001C-889/02 — Autonomia De Entidades Territoriales. Aplicación A La Descentralización Territorial Y No Por Servicios · cited 29 timesC-889/022002C-180/02 — Fallo Inhibitorio Por Ineptitud De Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Norma Del Decreto Ley 262 De 2000C-180/022002
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites3
Cited by2

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.