JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 30, 1995Full bench

C-560 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 1724/95. Eficacia De Las Normas De Conmocion Interior Sobre Seguridad Ciudadana. Inexequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conmocion Interior
  • Inconstitucionalidad de decretos expedidos
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1724/95. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionDecreto 1724/95STRUCK DOWN
Phrase struck down«La modificación introducida por el artíuclo 2 del Decreto 1724 de 1995 fue declarado inexequible, razón por la cual revivió su texto original»
On the entire provisionDecreto 1724/95STRUCK DOWN
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. Declárase INEXEQUIBLE el Decreto 1724 de octubre 6 de 1995. "Por el cual se dictan medidas para asegurar la eficacia de las normas de conmoción interior sobre seguridad ciudadana"
  2. SEGUNDO. Los efectos del presente fallo son hacia el futuro.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available4
DissentAlejandro Martínez CaballeroConcurrenceFabio Morón DíazDissentCarlos Gaviria DíazDissentAntonio Barrera Carbonell
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.