JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 16, 1996Full bench

C-537 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Jose Antonio Galan Gomez

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 3/86. Art. 13 Inc. 1 Parc. Dec. 1222/86. Art. 304 Inc.1 Parc. Dec. 1221/86. Art. 65 Inc. 1 Parc. Empl. Publ. Y Trabaj. Oficiales. Ver <a Href=../1996/C-536-96.Rtf> C-536/96</A>. Inex. Art. 65.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Empleos De Establecimientos Publicos
  • Facultad legislativa para clasificarlos
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 3/86. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 13Ley 3/86ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 304Decreto 1222/86ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 65Decreto 1221/86STRUCK DOWN· phrase
Phrase struck down«inciso 1 "en los estatutos de los establecimientos se precisará q...»
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. ESTESE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia No. C-536 de 1996 que declaró inexequibles los apartes acusados de los artículos 13 inciso 1o. de la Ley 3a. de 1986 y 304 inciso 1o. del Decreto-Ley 1222 de 1986.
  4. Segundo. Declarar INEXEQUIBLE el artículo 65 inciso 1o. del Decreto-Ley 1221 de 1986 en la parte que dice "En los estatutos de los establecimientos se precisará qué actividades pueden ser desempeñadas por personas vinculadas mediante contrato de trabajo".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.