JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 27, 2004Full bench

C-534 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓
Topic · hard data
Control De Constitucionalidad A Las Enmiendas Al Convenio Constitutivo De La Organizacion Maritima Internacional
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 874 de 2004.

Enmiendas al convenio constitutivo de la organización maritima internacional.

Institucionalizacion del comité de facilitacion.

Aprobacion y sancion presidencial.

Tramite legislativo.

Exequibles.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 874/04. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLES la Resolucion A.724(17) aprobada el siete (7) de noviembre de mil novecientos noventa y uno (1991) - Enmiendas al Convenio Constitutivo de la Organizacion Maritima Internacional (Institucionalizacion del Comite de Facilitacion) y Anexo Enmiendas al Convenio Constitutivo de la Organizacion Maritima Internacional (Institucionalizacion del comite de Facilitacion) y la Resolucion A.735 (18) aprobada el cuatro (4) de noviembre de mil novecientos noventa y tres (1993) - Convenio Constitutivo de la Organizacion Maritima Internacional y Anexo - Enmiendas al Convenio Constitutivo de la Organizacion Maritima Internacional". Asi como la ley 874 de enero 2 de 2004 que las aprueba.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.