JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 16, 2001Full bench

C-502 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓
Topic · hard data
Inhibicion En Objecion Presidencial. Discrepancias Entre Las Cámaras
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inhibicion En Objecion Presidencial
  • Discrepancias entre las Cámaras
Proyecto De Ley Objetado
  • Archivo por discrepancias de informes de Cámaras
Ley Organica
  • Desconocimiento
Objecion Presidencial
  • Procedimiento
  • Trámite en el Congreso de la República
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Proyecto de ley no 231 de 2000.

Senado no.101 de 1998.

Camara.

Vinculacion de la nacion a la conmemoracion de los ciento quince años de fundacion del municipio de bolivar departamento del valle del cauca.

Y se autorizan apropiaciones presupuestales

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 231/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionLey 231/00DECLINED TO RULE
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. INHIBIRSE, por las razones anotadas en la parte considerativa de esta providencia, de emitir pronunciamiento de fondo respecto de la exequibilidad del proyecto de Ley Ndeg 231 de 2000, Senado; Ndeg 101 de 1998, Camara, "Por la cual la Nacion se vincula a la conmemoracion de los ciento quince anos de fundacion del Municipio de Bolivar, Departamento del Valle del Cauca y se autorizan apropiaciones presupuestales para proyectos de infraestructura e interes social y ambiental".
  2. Segundo. REMITANSE al Congreso de la Republica, para lo de su competencia, el expediente de la referencia con la sentencia correspondiente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.