JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 2, 1997Full bench

C-494 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Luis Alfredo Fajardo Malagon

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 1400/70 C.P.C. Arts. 99 Y 354 Parciales. Tramite Y Decision De Las Exepciones Previas. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Debido Proceso Constitucional
  • Alcance de facultades del legislador
Juicio De Constitucionalidad
  • El referente no puede ser legislación ordinaria
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1400/70. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 1Decreto 1400/70UPHELD
Art. 354Decreto 1400/70ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 354Decreto 1400/70UPHELD
Art. 354Decreto 1400/70UPHELD
Art. 99Decreto 1400/70UPHELD
Art. 99Decreto 1400/70UPHELD
Art. 1Decreto 2282/89UPHELD
7 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Estese a lo resuelto en la sentencia C-446 de octubre 4 de 1995, que declaro EXEQUIBLE el articulo 354 del Codigo de Procedimiento Civil, tal como fue modificado por el decreto 2282 de 1989.
  2. Segundo. Declarase EXEQUIBLE el numeral 6 del articulo 99 del Codigo de Procedimiento Civil, tal como fue modificado por el decreto 2282 de 1989.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceEduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.