JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 30, 1995Full bench

C-482 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 2083/94. Arts. 18 Y 60. Estatuto De La Esap. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 2083/94. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 1Decreto 2083/94 «“establecimiento público del orden nacional”»UPHELD
Art. 6Decreto 2083/94UPHELD
Art. 8Decreto 2083/94 «“agente del Presidente de la República de su libre nombramiento y remoción”»UPHELD
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la expresión "establecimiento público del orden nacional" contenida en el artículo 1o. del Decreto 2083 de 1994, por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
  4. Segundo. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el literal c) del Artículo 6o del Decreto 2083 de 1994, por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
  5. Tercero. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la expresión "agente del Presidente de la República de su libre nombramiento y remoción" contenida en el artículo 8o. del Decreto 2083 de 1994, por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.