JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 4, 2000Full bench

C-482 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Alexander Lopez Quiroz

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio Por Derogación Tácita De Norma
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 141/94.

Art. 16 paragrafo 6.

Por el cual se crea el fondo nal de regalias.

Disminucion de porcentaje de regalias por el presidente de la republica.

Sentencia inhibitoria.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 141/94. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 16Ley 141/94 «parágrafo 6»DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 6Ley 141/94DECLINED TO RULE
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE :
  3. INHIBIRSE para emitir pronunciamiento de fondo por carencia actual de objeto con respecto del parágrafo 6º, del artículo 16 de la ley 141 de 1994, "Por la cual se crean el Fondo Nacional de Regalías, la Comisión Nacional de Regalías, se regula el derecho del Estado a percibir regalías por la explotación de recursos naturales no renovables, se establecen las reglas para su liquidación y distribución y se dictan otras disposiciones", por haber sido derogado por el artículo 73 de la ley 508 de 1999.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.