JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 15, 2002Full bench

C-378 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Jorge Luis Pabon Apicella

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional En Desvinculación Del Servicio, Caducidad Contractual E Inhabilidad Sobreviniente En Acción De Repetición
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Desvinculación del servicio, caducidad contractual e inhabilidad sobreviniente en acción de repetición
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 678 de 2001.

Art. 17.

Determinacion de responsabilidad patrimonial de los agentes del estado a traves del ejercicio de la accion de repeticion o de llamamiento en garantia con fines de repeticion.

Desvinculacion del servicio.

Caducidad contractual.

Estese a lo resuelto a la c-233/02

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 678/01. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 17Ley 678/01ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-233 de 2002, que decidio declarar inexequible el articulo 17 de la Ley 678 de 2001, en relacion con la expresion "por un termino de cinco (5) anos", contenida en dicha preceptiva.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.