C-376 de 2002
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil
✓Claimant Carlos Arturo Malambo
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Omisión en demanda conjunta de disposiciones para determinar contenido normativo vigente y entendimiento
- Integración
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 599 de 2000.
Art. 402 (p.).
Codigo penal.
Delitos contra la administracion publica.
Peculado.
Omision de consignar del agente retenedor o recaudador.
Ley 633 de 2000.
Inepta demanda.
Inhibida.
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 599/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Declararse inhibida para fallar de la demanda dirigida contra la expresion "(...) en prision de tres (3) a seis (6) anos y (...)", contenida en el primer inciso del articulo 402 de la Ley 599 de 2000, por ineptitud sustancial de la demanda.
- De conformidad con lo dispuesto en los articulos 16 y 18 del Decreto 2067 de 1991,
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.