JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 16, 1997Full bench

C-291 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Leonardo Lopez Amaya

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 100/80. C.P. Art. 92 Parcial. Rehabilitacion. Ver. <a Href=../1997/C-087-97.Rtf> C-087/97</A>
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Excepción a rehabilitación de penas
Cosa Juzgada Relativa
  • Excepción a rehabilitación de penas
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 100/80. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionDecreto 100/80ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. ESTESE A LO RESUELTO por la Corte en Sentencia C-087 del 26 de febrero de 1997.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
ConcurrenceJosé Gregorio Hernández GalindoConcurrenceCarlos Gaviria Díaz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.