JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 8, 2005Full bench

C-207 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Herlein Gaviria Zuluaga Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada En Regimen Simplificado Del Impuesto A Las Ventas
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Requisitos para pertenecer al Régimen Simplificado del Impuesto a las Ventas
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 863 de 2003 art. 14 numeral 3.

Se establecen normas tributarias aduaneras fiscales y de control para estimular el crecimiento economico y el saneamiento de las finanzas publicas.

Regimen simplificado del impuesto sobre las ventas.

Ubicacion del establecimiento de comercio.

La condicion establecida en el numeral 3 acusado es irracional e irrazonable.

Cosa juzgada.

Estese a lo resuelto en la sentencia c-1114/04

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 863/03. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 14Ley 863/03ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE :
  3. Estarse a lo resuelto en la sentencia C-1114 de 2004, que declaró inexequible el numeral 3 del artículo 14 de la Ley 863 de 2003 "por la cual se establecen normas tributarias, aduaneras, fiscales y de control para estimular el crecimiento económico y el saneamiento de las finanzas públicas".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.