JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 28, 2001Full bench

C-1254 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Uprimny Yepes

✓Claimant Fernando Nuñez Africano

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional En Tasa Especial Por Los Servicios Aduaneros
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Tasa especial por los servicios aduaneros
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 633 de 2000.

Arts. 56 y 57.

Normas en materia tributaria.

Tratamiento a los fondos obligatorios para vivienda de interes social y fortalecimiento finanzas de la rama judicial.

Tasa especial por los servicios aduaneros.

Administracion y control.

Cosa juzgada constitucional.

Estese a lo resuelto en c-992/01

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 633/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 56Ley 633/00ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 57Ley 633/00ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE :
  3. Estarse a lo resuelto en la sentencia C-992 de 19 de septiembre de 2001, que declaró inexequibles los artículos 56 y 57 de la Ley 633 de 2000.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceMarco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.